Religious Satire, Moral Restraint and the Charlie Hebdo Cartoons

نویسندگان

چکیده

In Otto-Preminger, the European Court of Human Rights (EctHR) upheld decision Innsbruck Provincial in Austria ordering forfeiture a film portraying Catholicism satirical form community where vast majority population were Roman Catholics because Austrian authorities had acted to ensure religious peace region as well prevent an unwarranted and offensive attack on their religion. The EctHR considered its function be that balancing two conflicting rights free expression freedom. This article argues it is minority dissenting judgment three judges, which right both freedom stands best protected future. not untrammeled but carries within exercise obligation “moral restraint” judges based opinions. A quarter century after decision, with cases such Charlie Hebdo Murders France, timely consider whether opinions carry seeds wisdom for

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Are You Charlie or Ahmed? Cultural Pluralism in Charlie Hebdo Response on Twitter

We study the response to the Charlie Hebdo shootings of January 7, 2015 on Twitter across the globe. We ask whether the stances on the issue of freedom of speech can be modeled using established sociological theories, including Huntington’s culturalist Clash of Civilizations, and those taking into consideration social context, including Density and Interdependence theories. We find support for ...

متن کامل

A case study of conspiracy theories about Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack

The results of the public opinion poll performed in January 2015, just after the terrorist attack on the French satirical weekly magazine Charlie Hebdo and the kosher supermarket in Paris, when 17 people were killed, showed that a significant number of French citizens held conspiratorial beliefs about it (17%). This gave reason to an alternative analysis of public opinion, presented in this pap...

متن کامل

To Be or Not to Be Charlie: Twitter Hashtags as a Discourse and Counter-discourse in the Aftermath of the 2015 Charlie Hebdo Shooting in France

Following a shooting attack by two self-proclaimed Islamist gunmen at the offices of French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo on 7th January 2015, there emerged the hashtag #JeSuisCharlie on Twitter as an expression of condolences for the victims, solidarity, and support for the magazine’s right to free speech. A lmos t s imu l t aneous ly, howeve r, t he r e was a l so #JeNeSuisPasCharlie explici...

متن کامل

Should We Be Charlie? A Deliberative Take on Religion and Secularism in Mediated Public Spheres

The terror attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in January 2015 serves to explore the role of religion and secularism in mediated public spheres. We argue that deliberative theory, including its recent criticisms and extensions, helps navigate normative dilemmas presented by the attacks. From a deliberative perspective, journalists should reprint Charlie cartoons that are perce...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Human Rights Quarterly

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1085-794X', '0275-0392']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2022.0005